Law/criminal Justice Case Briefs

Terry v . Ohio392 U .S . 1 (1967FACTSA plain diverge state policeman observed Terry and two other(a) custody involved in suspicious movement on the passageway . The police police military officer believed that they were planning to hook shop . The officer stopped the persons and frisked the lead men and correct weapons concealed on the person of Terry and Chiltron . They were charged beneath [392 U .S . 1 , 2] . Terry was convicted and was sent to prison for three months by the running court . Ohio court of appeals affirm the credit and the Ohio arrogant coquette refused to hear the slickness as it matt-up that no substantial constitutional question was involved . The US Supreme hook decided to hear the case as the poop Amendment decent against unreasonable bet and transports was applied to the case . This right w as match against the right of a police officer [392 U .S .

1 , 3] to make a reasonable anticipate for weapons of the person believed by him to be armed and dangerousU S Supreme Court in an 8 to 1 decision affirmed the judgmentISSUEWhether the search and seizure of Terry and others was in violation of the quaternate AmendmentHOLDINGNo . A search at a lower placetaken by the officer was reasonable under the Fourth Amendment and that the weapons found on Terry and other could be presented as depict against Terry and the other personsRATIONALETerry contended that he was searched and seized in violation of the Fourth Amendmen t and the evidence of...If you want to get a! full essay, orderliness it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper